Research Hub
Access curated myopia research, key clinical trials, and the latest evidence on treatment efficacy. All studies are peer-reviewed and sourced from leading ophthalmology journals.
High-Impact Studies
The most influential myopia research shaping clinical practice
Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia: Systematic Review
Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al.
Ophthalmology
Landmark systematic review analyzing 145 studies from 1995-2015. Projected that myopia will affect 4.758 billion people (49.8% of world population) by 2050, with 938 million (9.8%) having high myopia. East Asia shows highest prevalence at 80-90% in young adults.
ATOM2 Study: Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia - 5-Year Results
Chia A, Lu QS, Tan D.
Ophthalmology
Five-year follow-up of the ATOM2 study comparing 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% atropine in 400 children. While higher concentrations showed greater initial efficacy, 0.01% atropine demonstrated the best long-term outcomes due to minimal rebound effect after cessation. Cumulative myopia progression over 5 years was lowest in the 0.01% group.
Interventions to Slow Progression of Myopia in Children
Huang J, Wen D, Wang Q, et al.
Ophthalmology
Network meta-analysis of 30 randomized controlled trials comparing 16 interventions for myopia control. High-dose atropine (0.5-1%) showed highest efficacy but with significant side effects. Moderate-dose atropine, orthokeratology, and peripheral defocus lenses showed good efficacy with better tolerability.
LAMP Study: Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (Phase 2)
Yam JC, Jiang Y, Tang SM, et al.
Ophthalmology
This randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of low-concentration atropine eye drops (0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01%) for controlling myopia progression in 438 children aged 4-12 years. At 1 year, 0.05% atropine showed the greatest efficacy with spherical equivalent change of -0.27±0.61 D compared to -0.81±0.53 D in placebo (67% reduction). Axial length elongation was 0.20±0.25 mm vs 0.41±0.22 mm in placebo.
Genome-Wide Association Study of Refractive Error
Tedja MS, Wojciechowski R, Hysi PG, et al.
Nature Genetics
Largest GWAS meta-analysis to date with 160,420 participants identifying 161 genetic loci associated with refractive error. Genes involved in neurotransmission, ion transport, retinoic acid metabolism, and extracellular matrix organization were implicated. Genetic risk score explained 7.8% of variance.
Treatment Efficacy Summary (Based on Clinical Evidence)
Treatment | Efficacy Range | Evidence Level | Key Studies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Light Therapy | 69-77% | Emerging (RCTs) | Jiang et al. 2022 |
| Atropine 0.05% | 60-67% | High (RCTs) | LAMP, ATOM2 |
| DIMS/Stellest Spectacles | 50-62% | High (RCTs) | DIMS 2-Year Trial |
| Outdoor Time (2+ hrs/day) | ~50% prevention | High (Meta-analyses) | Xiong et al. 2017 |
| Orthokeratology | 43-55% | High (RCTs) | ROMIO, Multiple Meta-analyses |
| MiSight/Soft Multifocal CL | 40-52% | High (FDA Approved) | MiSight 3-Year Trial |
| Atropine 0.01% | 27-50% | High (RCTs) | ATOM2, LAMP |
* Efficacy measured as reduction in myopia progression (spherical equivalent or axial length) compared to control groups. Individual results may vary. Consult an eye care professional for personalized recommendations.
All Studies
20 studies
Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia: Systematic Review
Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al.
Ophthalmology2016
Landmark systematic review analyzing 145 studies from 1995-2015. Projected that myopia will affect 4.758 billion people (49.8% of world population) by 2050, with 938 million (9.8%) having high myopia. East Asia shows highest prevalence at 80-90% in young adults.
Key Findings:
ATOM2 Study: Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia - 5-Year Results
Chia A, Lu QS, Tan D.
Ophthalmology2016
Five-year follow-up of the ATOM2 study comparing 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% atropine in 400 children. While higher concentrations showed greater initial efficacy, 0.01% atropine demonstrated the best long-term outcomes due to minimal rebound effect after cessation. Cumulative myopia progression over 5 years was lowest in the 0.01% group.
Key Findings:
Interventions to Slow Progression of Myopia in Children
Huang J, Wen D, Wang Q, et al.
Ophthalmology2016
Network meta-analysis of 30 randomized controlled trials comparing 16 interventions for myopia control. High-dose atropine (0.5-1%) showed highest efficacy but with significant side effects. Moderate-dose atropine, orthokeratology, and peripheral defocus lenses showed good efficacy with better tolerability.
Key Findings:
LAMP Study: Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (Phase 2)
Yam JC, Jiang Y, Tang SM, et al.
Ophthalmology2019
This randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of low-concentration atropine eye drops (0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01%) for controlling myopia progression in 438 children aged 4-12 years. At 1 year, 0.05% atropine showed the greatest efficacy with spherical equivalent change of -0.27±0.61 D compared to -0.81±0.53 D in placebo (67% reduction). Axial length elongation was 0.20±0.25 mm vs 0.41±0.22 mm in placebo.
Key Findings:
Genome-Wide Association Study of Refractive Error
Tedja MS, Wojciechowski R, Hysi PG, et al.
Nature Genetics2019
Largest GWAS meta-analysis to date with 160,420 participants identifying 161 genetic loci associated with refractive error. Genes involved in neurotransmission, ion transport, retinoic acid metabolism, and extracellular matrix organization were implicated. Genetic risk score explained 7.8% of variance.
Key Findings:
Myopia Prevalence Trends in East Asian Children
Morgan IG, French AN, Ashby RS, et al.
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research2018
Comprehensive review of myopia epidemiology in East Asia, where prevalence has reached 80-90% in young adults in urban areas of China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. Educational pressure and reduced outdoor time identified as key modifiable risk factors.
Key Findings:
MiSight 1 Day 3-Year Clinical Trial Results
Chamberlain P, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Logan NS, et al.
Optometry and Vision Science2019
Three-year randomized controlled trial of MiSight 1 day soft contact lenses in 144 children aged 8-12 years. MiSight lenses reduced myopia progression by 59% (refractive) and 52% (axial length) compared to single vision contact lenses. This led to FDA approval for myopia control in 2019.
Key Findings:
ROMIO Study: Retardation of Myopia in Orthokeratology
Cho P, Cheung SW.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science2012
Two-year randomized clinical trial in Hong Kong comparing orthokeratology to single-vision spectacles in 102 children aged 6-10 years. Orthokeratology reduced axial elongation by 43% (0.36 mm vs 0.63 mm). Younger children and those with faster baseline progression showed greater benefit.
Key Findings:
COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Childhood Myopia
Wang J, Li Y, Musch DC, et al.
JAMA Ophthalmology2021
Study of 123,535 Chinese children showing significant increase in myopia prevalence during COVID-19 lockdowns. Children aged 6-8 years showed 1.4-3 times higher myopia prevalence in 2020 compared to previous years, attributed to increased screen time and reduced outdoor activity.
Key Findings:
Outdoor Activity and Myopia: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
Xiong S, Sankaridurg P, Naduvilath T, et al.
Acta Ophthalmologica2017
Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of 25 studies examining outdoor time and myopia. Each additional hour of outdoor time per week was associated with 2% reduced odds of myopia. Children spending 2+ hours daily outdoors had approximately 50% lower risk of developing myopia.
Key Findings:
DIMS Spectacle Lens 2-Year Clinical Trial
Lam CSY, Tang WC, Tse DY, et al.
British Journal of Ophthalmology2020
Two-year randomized controlled trial of Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments (DIMS) spectacle lenses in 183 Hong Kong children aged 8-13 years. DIMS lenses reduced myopia progression by 52% and axial elongation by 62% compared to single vision lenses, with sustained efficacy throughout the study period.
Key Findings:
Long-Term Safety of Orthokeratology in Children
Hiraoka T, Kakita T, Okamoto F, et al.
Ophthalmology2012
Five-year follow-up study of 43 children using orthokeratology. No serious adverse events were observed. Corneal endothelial cell density remained stable. Myopia control effect was maintained throughout the study period with 36% reduction in axial elongation.
Key Findings:
Low-Dose Atropine for Myopia Control: Meta-Analysis
Gong Q, Janowski M, Luo M, et al.
Journal of AAPOS2017
Meta-analysis of 19 studies examining low-dose atropine (0.01-0.05%) for myopia control. Found clear dose-response relationship with higher concentrations showing greater efficacy but also more side effects. 0.01% showed best balance of efficacy and tolerability for long-term use.
Key Findings:
Bright Light Exposure and Myopia Prevention
Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science2014
Study examining the role of light intensity vs duration in myopia protection. Found that bright light exposure (>1000 lux) was more protective than total time outdoors, suggesting that light intensity is the key factor in outdoor protection against myopia.
Key Findings:
Efficacy of Orthokeratology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Si JK, Tang K, Bi HS, et al.
PLOS ONE2015
Meta-analysis of 7 clinical trials with 435 participants evaluating orthokeratology for myopia control. Overall, orthokeratology reduced axial elongation by 45% compared to controls. Effect was consistent across different study populations and follow-up periods.
Key Findings:
Gene-Environment Interaction in Myopia Development
Fan Q, Verhoeven VJ, Wojciechowski R, et al.
PLOS Genetics2016
Study of 40,036 participants examining gene-environment interactions in myopia. Found that genetic risk for myopia is amplified by educational attainment, with each additional year of education increasing the effect of genetic variants. Supports gene-environment interaction model.
Key Findings:
Screen Time and Myopia in Children: Systematic Review
Lanca C, Saw SM.
British Journal of Ophthalmology2020
Systematic review of 15 studies examining screen time and myopia. Found consistent association between increased screen time and myopia, with risk increasing by 30% for each additional hour of daily screen use. Effect was independent of near work from reading.
Key Findings:
Repeated Low-Level Red Light (RLRL) for Myopia Control
Jiang Y, Zhu Z, Tan X, et al.
Ophthalmology2022
Randomized controlled trial of 264 children aged 8-13 years comparing repeated low-level red light therapy (650nm, 3 minutes twice daily) to single vision spectacles. RLRL showed 76.6% reduction in myopia progression and 69.4% reduction in axial elongation at 12 months. Some children showed axial length shortening.
Key Findings:
Axial Length Changes After Discontinuation of Myopia Control
Cho P, Cheung SW.
Optometry and Vision Science2017
Study examining what happens when myopia control treatments are stopped. Orthokeratology showed partial rebound in first 6 months but axial length remained shorter than controls. High-dose atropine showed significant rebound while low-dose showed minimal rebound.
Key Findings:
Combination Therapy for Myopia Control: Atropine + Ortho-K
Kinoshita N, Konno Y, Hamada N, et al.
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology2020
Prospective study of 80 children comparing orthokeratology alone vs combination with 0.01% atropine. Combination therapy showed 75% reduction in axial elongation compared to 50% with orthokeratology alone. Suggests additive effect of combining treatments.
Key Findings:
Understanding Research Quality
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
Gold standard for clinical evidence. Participants randomly assigned to treatment or control groups, minimizing bias.
Meta-Analyses
Statistical combination of multiple studies to increase power and precision. Provides strongest evidence when well-conducted.
Epidemiological Studies
Large population studies examining disease patterns, risk factors, and prevalence trends across different groups.
Peer Review
All studies featured here have undergone peer review by experts before publication in scientific journals.
Key Resources
American Academy of Ophthalmology
Clinical guidelines, patient education materials, and practice patterns for myopia control.
Visit AAOInternational Myopia Institute
White papers, consensus statements, and global myopia research initiatives from leading experts.
Visit IMIPubMed Database
Search the complete database of myopia-related peer-reviewed publications and clinical studies.
Search PubMedAre You a Researcher?
Submit your myopia research for peer review and potential inclusion in our database.
Submit ResearchStay Updated on Myopia Research
Subscribe to receive monthly research digests with the latest studies and clinical findings.
Community Q&A
Research & Treatment Questions
Ask questions about myopia research, clinical studies, and treatment options. Get answers from researchers, providers, and fellow parents.
My 8-year-old was just diagnosed with -2.00 myopia. The doctor recommended Ortho-K lenses. Is this a good option for her age? I'm worried about her handling contact lenses.
Great question! Ortho-K is actually very well-suited for children around 8 years old. Studies show children often adapt to lens handling better than adults expect. The key is parental supervision during the initial learning period. I'd recommend asking your doctor about a trial period to see how your daughter adjusts.
We started our son on Ortho-K at age 7. It took about 2 weeks for him to get comfortable with the routine, but now he does it himself with minimal supervision. The results have been amazing - his prescription hasn't changed in 2 years!
Has anyone tried low-dose atropine drops? Our doctor mentioned 0.01% concentration. What side effects should we expect?
Questions and answers are moderated. Please be respectful and follow our community guidelines.
Related Resources
Explore More on MyopiaProgression.com
Parent Portal
Comprehensive guides for parents on myopia management and treatment options.
Educator Portal
Resources for teachers to identify vision problems in students.
FAQ
Answers to common questions about childhood myopia and treatments.
Compare Treatments
Side-by-side comparison of myopia control treatment options.
Find Myopia Control Specialists by City
Connect with certified myopia control specialists offering myopia control treatment in your area.
Worried your child's myopia (nearsightedness) is getting worse?
Take the 2–3 minute risk assessment and get a clear next step.
Eye doctor?
Join our network where parents search for myopia specialists.
Pre-launch: secure your placement now.

5 Signs Your Child Needs Myopia Control
A quick-start guide for concerned parents. Learn when to take action.